Before you start searching the literature, you should finalise your research question(s) or hypothesis(es). Research degree students should do this in consultation with supervisors.
Strategies for getting started:
|
Answerable |
Can you investigate or measure it? Is it an actual question and not just a statement? Your research can be framed as a problem, hypothesis or objectives and aims. |
Clear |
Consider wording carefully, will your audience understand exactly what you are researching? Remember, every word has meaning and slight changes in wording can change the meaning of your research question. |
Focused |
Your question needs to be a foreground question (see below) that is manageable. Too broad and you will have trouble answering it, too narrow and you will not have enough to explore. Getting the balance just right can take time. |
Relevant |
Are you interested in it? Is there an audience for it? |
Adapted from Developing a research question, University of Melbourne, 2018.
What is a foreground question? Slide the bar across to see the difference.
The following videos go through strategies to help you develop a research question.
Watch for more guidance:
For more help see:
Using a question framework can help you develop an answerable research question. Some frameworks used within health that may be useful for other disciplines include:
PICO - effectiveness questions |
Population (who?), Intervention (program, activity, event or initiative), Comparison (if needed) and Outcome (what?) |
PICo - qualitative or policy questions | Population (who?), Interest area (event, experience, activity or process) and Context (setting or environment) |
For example:
Sometimes you may not have a question that fits perfectly into a framework. However, you may find it useful to use elements from different frameworks to help you form your question.
Explore more frameworks:
The question(s) you are asking will determine how you search and what type of evidence/study design is needed to answer it.
Research question | Qualitative research | Survey | Case control studies | Cohort studies | Randomised controlled trials | Quasi-experimental studies | Non-experimental studies | Systematic reviews |
Does this work better compared to doing that? |
|
|
|
* |
** |
* |
|
*** |
How does something work? |
** |
* |
|
|
|
|
* |
*** |
Does something matter? |
** |
** |
|
|
|
|
|
*** |
Will this do more good than harm? |
* |
|
* |
* |
** |
* |
* |
*** |
Will users want to take up a service, program or intervention? |
** |
* |
|
|
|
* |
* |
*** |
Is it worth investing in this service, program or intervention? |
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
*** |
Is this the right service, program intervention for this group? |
** |
** |
|
|
|
|
|
** |
Are users, providers or stakeholders happy with this service, program or intervention? |
** |
** |
* |
* |
|
|
|
* |
* The stars show weight given for each study type.
This table has been adapted from: