Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Scoping Reviews: Report search results

Library guide for the development of scoping reviews and their associated systematic searches, and required reporting.

Report search results


Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is the established reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, given the difference between systematic and scoping reviews, some items in PRISMA may not be appropriate to consider for a scoping review, and other important considerations may be missing.

To address this, a PRISMA extension for scoping reviews, PRISMA-ScR, has been created to provide reporting guidance for this specific type of knowledge synthesis. This extension is also intended to apply to evidence maps, as these share similarities with scoping reviews and involve a systematic search of a body of literature to identify knowledge gaps, with a visual representation of results (such as a figure or graph).

Below is an example of an PRISMA-SCR flowchart

Screenshot of a PRISMA flowchart showing the number of results included at each stage of the scoping review process.

Reproduced from: Tricco AC, et al 2018, "PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)"

Capture your search

Record the following:

 Number 1 icon Title of database searched.
 Number 2 icon Name of the database and platform.
 Number 3 icon Database date range.
 Number 4 icon Date search conducted.
 Number 5 icon Years covered by the search.
 Number 6 icon Search strategy (incl. all search terms & limits).
 Number 7 icon Grey literature.

Navigate to report broken links and provide feedback page